Elections

Spoke in favor of secure mail-in voting chain-of-custody protocols and limited drop boxes.

Expressed disappointment with Board of Elections transparency, urged reconsideration of the ECRSSA decision, and criticized the rejection of mobile device accommodation resolutions.

Compared Jim Wertz's inquiries into election data to scientific inquiry, defending him against conflict of interest accusations.

Expressed shock over ECRSSA's closure and questioned double standards regarding election commissioner statements.

Defended paper ballot verification procedures and criticized the opaque actions surrounding the election board meeting.

Provided a legal definition of conflict of interest and questioned why Jim Wertz was targeted without evidence.

Highlighted double standards in how council members treat election integrity claims versus Jim Wertz's inquiries.

Called the removal of Jim Wertz unreasonable and reflective of council incompetence.

Questioned why council members never censured partisan election deniers while swiftly ousting Jim Wertz.

Encouraged voters to check mail-in ballot instructions and criticized the hasty ouster of the election board chair.

Addressed citizen recording rights in public buildings and expressed solidarity with Jim Wertz.

Spoke on behalf of the Democratic Party condemning the removal of Jim Wertz as election chair as a partisan error in judgment.

Emphasized that public trust has been damaged by the election board situation and urged council to focus on transparency.

Asked council to appoint senior members as co-chairs for balance and suggested donating tiny homes to veterans.